However, consequentialism focuses on judging the moral worth of the results of the actions and deontological ethics focuses on judging the actions themselves. Consequentialism focuses on the consequences or results of an action. Deontological ethics holds that at least some acts are morally obligatory regardless of their consequences for human welfare. By contrast, teleological ethics also called consequentialist ethics or consequentialism holds that the basic standard of morality is precisely the value of what an action brings into being.
In brief, deontology is patient-centered, whereas utilitarianism is society-centered. Perhaps the greatest difficulty with utilitarianism is that it fails to take into account considerations of justice. We can imagine instances where a certain course of action would produce great benefits for society, but they would be clearly unjust.
The moral philosophy of Immanuel Kant exemplifies deontological normative ethics. In deontology, moral duties are typically expressed by rules. The Golden Rule is a deontological principle of ethics.
Most people believe the Golden Rule is a correct moral principle because it expresses a basic fairness. To Kant, all humans must be seen as inherently worthy of respect and dignity. He argued that all morality must stem from such duties: a duty based on a deontological ethic.
Consequences such as pain or pleasure are irrelevant. Your friend wants to know whether you like the gift. You believe that lying is a bad action, no matter the results; therefore, you would tell that you hate it even if you are hurting your friend.
Here, you are demonstrating a deontological position as you are disregarding the possible consequences of your actions when determining what is right and what is wrong. Consequentialism refers to a set of normative ethical theories that states an action should be judged right or wrong on the basis of its consequences. Thus, according to consequentialism, a morally right act is an act that will produce good results. Furthermore, the more good results an act produces, the better or more right that act will be.
There are different forms of consequentialism; utilitarianism and hedonism are two such main forms. Hedonism, in contrast, states something is good if its results produce pleasure or avoid pain. Furthermore, consequentialism is often contrasted with deontology as well as virtue ethics.
Deontology is an ethical theory that states it is possible to determine the rightness or wrongness of actions by examining actions themselves, without focusing on their consequences whereas consequentialism is an ethical theory that states it is possible to determine the rightness or wrongness of actions by examining its consequences. Answered by Hazel D. Need help with Philosophy and Ethics?
Answered by George A. Answered by Omamerhi E. Answered by. Answered by Daisy V. Payment Security.
0コメント