Therefore, when we see people in a particular role, we tend to assume that they are well-suited for it and, by extension, not so well suited for other roles. For example, women are more likely to have responsibilities for rearing children, so on average they spend more time than men nurturing others. Seeing that, we come to believe that women are naturally nurturing, downplaying the extent to which they may simply be carrying out the responsibilities of their roles.
Reverse the sex roles, and the impressions we have of the sexes change, too Eagley and Steffen, Race, like gender, determines many of the roles people hold in this country. People of color are over-represented in low-paying jobs, and therefore can seem to White people to be somehow destined for them.
To the extent, then, that we are more likely to see members of particular groups in some roles, and less likely to see them in other roles, we develop stereotypes as a result. Stereotypes can shift as roles shift, sometimes in surprising ways.
In hindsight, of course, it is easy to understand the sociological factors that prevented Black students from playing for the best teams, or kept the best Black teams from playing for championships. At the time, however, it seemed to Schneider and his friends like a logical deduction from their unbiased observations about the world of Hoosier sports. Now people watch NBA games and come away with the equally ludicrous conclusion that all Black people are innately hyper-athletic.
What we believe depends, in part, on what we see—but what we see is a function of social roles and arrangements that are created by a complex set of historical, political, and economic factors.
The Bottom Line: Stereotypes are pervasive, and powerful, in part because they affect how we see the world even when our subjective experience leads us to believe we are simply describing the world as it actually exists. We rarely believe ourselves to be influenced by stereotype, making us even more susceptible to their effects.
This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves. This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access. Abelson, R. Modes of resolution of belief dilemmas. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 3 , — CrossRef Google Scholar. Ajzen, I. A Bayesian analysis of attribution processes. Psychological Bulletin, 82 , — Allport, G. The nature of prejudice.
Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. Google Scholar. Anderson, C. Abstract and concrete data in the perseverance of social theories: When weak data lead to unshakable beliefs. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology , 19, 93— Perseverance of social theories: The role of explanation in the persistence of discredited information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39 , — Bargh, J. Individual construct accessibility, person memory, and the recall-judgment link: The case of information overload.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49 , — Borgida, E. Personal involvement and the robustness of perceptual salience effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45 , — Brewer, M.
Perceptions of the elderly: Stereotypes as prototypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41 , — The psychology of intergroup attitudes and behavior. Annual Review of Psychology, 36 , — Beyond the contact hypothesis: Theoretical perspectives on desegregation. Brewer Eds. New York: Academic Press. Brown, R. Interpersonal and intergroup behavior. Giles Eds. Oxford: Blackwell. Cantor, N.
Traits as prototypes: Effects on recognition memory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35 , 38— Chaiken, S. Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion.
Cohen, C. Person categories and social perception: Testing some boundaries of the processing effects of prior knowledge. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40 , — Costrich, N. When stereotypes hurt: Three studies of penalties for sex-role reversals.
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 11 , — Crocker, J. Person memory and causal attributions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44 , 55— Darley, J.
Berkowitz Ed. Dustin, D. Evaluative bias in group and individual competition. Journal of Social Psychology, 80 , — Easterbrook, J. The effect of emotion on cue utilization and the organization of behavior. Psychological Review, 66 , — Eiser, J. Categorization and social judgement. London: Academic Press. In the non-threat condition, they were told that the test was simply a problem solving exercise and was not diagnostic of ability.
Performance was compared in the two conditions and results showed that African American participants performed less well than their white counterparts in the stereotype threat condition, but in the non-threat condition their performance equaled that of their white counterparts.
In another study Shih, Pittinsky, and Ambady, Asian women were subtly reminded with a questionnaire of either their Asian identity or their female identity prior to taking a difficult math test.
Students taking the test under stereotype threat might also become inefficient on the test by rereading the questions and the answer choices, as well as rechecking their answers, more than when not under stereotype threat.
McLeod, S. Simply Psychology. Katz, D. Racial stereotypes of one hundred college students. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology , 28, Shih, M. Stereotype susceptibility: Identity salience and shifts in quantitative performance. Psychological science, 10 1 , Steele, C. Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans.
Journal of personality and social psychology, 69 5 , Implicit stereotypes, like other implicit associations can be viewed as cultural knowledge or folk wisdom that the person acquires through their experience in a culture Bruner, The idea that stereotypical associations are cultural in origin was proposed in the early work on stereotypes, but has tended to be ignored in the focus on the fallacy or bias of individual cognition. Journalist and political commentator Walter Lippmann is usually seen as stimulating the academic study of stereotyping with his book Public Opinion Hinton, To illustrate this, we can examine the origin of the associations identified in the Princeton studies, discussed at the beginning of this article, by considering the example of the English.
As Hinton has argued, the selected attributes reflect the notion of the English gentleman, a common representation of the Englishman in the American media of the first half of the twentieth century, and hence familiar to the exclusively male, upper-class Princeton student participants who, if they had encountered English people it is likely that they would be from the same class demographic as themselves.
It is also likely that these participants did not consider nor were they asked to do so a range of categories of English people, such as women or the working classes, so, not surprisingly, tended to focus on the specific and familiar representation of the English defined for them by their culture to paraphrase Lippmann.
By , the image of the English gentleman had become rather archaic and even a figure of fun in both the British and American media Hinton, and the selected English attributes had changed.
Even so, some students refused to do the task in and Brown et al. To perform the task with no information except the category name, the students may have simply drawn on attributes they knew to be commonly circulating about the English in their culture. Yet this does not mean that the students viewed all English people as sportsmanlike. However, the sportsmanlike English gentleman was a familiar trope in American popular culture at the time, typified by actor Ronald Colman in Hollywood movies such as The Dark Angel , , and Bulldog Drummond , A person with no personal antipathy to lawyers, and well-aware that they are a highly regulated profession of mostly honest people, might make the prediction that when a lawyer character appears in a popular crime drama that they will probably be crooked from the experience of lawyers in famous movies such as The Godfather series, —, and television programs such as Breaking Bad , —, along with the spin-off series about a crooked lawyer, Better Call Saul , As Devine has argued, well-learnt associations picked up during socialization form implicit stereotypes even for the individual seeking non-prejudiced views.
It is argued here that the predictive brain model provides the mechanism for this. Yet culture is neither monolithic nor fixed and unchanging. People are active in the construction both of their social world and their media environment Livingstone, ; Burr, People have links of acquaintanceship, friendship, etc.
Within any society, there will be different social networks of this kind communicating different social representations about social groups.
According to Moscovici , it is these shared representations that define a culture or subcultural group. Different cultural groups will differ ideologically through their position in society and the representations that circulate in the communication within their social network.
In the communication within any social network there will be regular and consistent associations between social groups and attributes, which will be picked up by it members, through the working of the predictive brain. The extent to which individuals share implicit associations will depend on the hegemonic social representations within the society across cultural groups Gillespie, , such as a positive belief in democracy and a negative view of communism, which are prevalent in the wider social institutions within a nation, and examined in the sociological study of stereotypes for example, Pickering, The role of stereotypes in communication within a social network was demonstrated by Kashima and colleagues Kashima and Yeung, ; Kashima et al.
The results showed that stereotype-consistent information was emphasized. Even though stereotype-inconsistent information attracted attention it was not necessarily passed on. Thus, the story became more stereotypical and consistent in the serial retelling. Within a social network common understandings are developed via the use of stereotypes.
Members of the culture assume a knowledge of the stereotype in other group members, which facilitates social interaction, but potentially also helps to maintain the stereotype, even in the face of inconsistent information. The complex dynamics of the individual within a social network for example, Christakis and Fowler, needs to be considered in investigating the formation, transmission and maintenance of implicit stereotypes.
In the modern world of the twenty-first century, the options available for people to construct their social environments have radically increased Giddens, The media has rapidly expanded through multiple television channels, a proliferation of media outlets, and the development of social media via the internet.
While this offers the potential for people to engage with a diversity of representation and counter-stereotypical information, it also allows people to remain in an ideological subculture, communicating with like-minded people where specific representations of cultural others are constantly being circulated unchallenged within the social network.
In terms of the predictive brain, implicit associations will develop from the consistent messages people receive in their everyday lives. If certain implicit stereotypes are deemed unacceptable then it will only be when people experience consistent counter-stereotypical information over a long period of time that these associations will be probabilistically undermined. Over the last 30 years stereotype research has focused on implicit stereotypes, particularly using the IAT, which have been interpreted as revealing an implicit or unconscious cognitive bias, even for the consciously fair-minded person.
Despite research questioning the predictive validity of the IAT as a method of revealing unconscious prejudice for example, Oswald et al. According to the predictive brain model, when the culture changes then the implicit stereotypes of its members will change albeit slowly for some associations. Therefore, to properly understand the nature of implicit stereotypes, the cognitive research needs to be combined with the study of the dynamics of culture, to understand the specific associations prevalent in the communication within a culture and their implicit influence on the members of that culture.
Palgrave Communications. I worked with the following data. Addison-Wesley: Reading, MA. Google Scholar. Harper and Row: New York. Psychological Science ; 25 9 : — Bargh JA Unconscious thought theory and its discontents: A critique of the critiques. Social Cognition ; 29 6 : — Bargh JA The cognitive monster: The case against controllability of automatic stereotype effects. In: Chaiken S and Trope Y eds. Dual Process Theories in Social Psychology. Guilford: New York, pp — Current Directions in Psychological Science ; 15 1 : 1—4.
Brown R Social Psychology. Collier-Macmillan: London. Bruner JS Acts of Meaning. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience ; 4 25 : 1— Social Justice Research ; 23 4 : — Clark A Perceiving as predicting. Perception and Its Modalities. Oxford University Press: New York, pp 23— Clark A Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences ; 36 3 : — Psychological Review ; 82 6 : — Journal of Experimental Psychology: General ; 9 : — Devine PG Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components.
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology ; 48 6 : — Dual-process Theories in Social Psychology. In: Nelson TD ed. Handbook of Prejudice, Sereotyping, and Discrimination. Taylor and Francis: New York, pp 61— Uncovering behavioral strategies. Journal of the American Statistical Society ; 90 : — Fox R Prejudice and the unfinished mind: A new look at an old failing. Psychological Inquiry ; 3 2 : — Social Psychology Quarterly ; 46 1 : 23— A historical perspective on current neuroscience literature.
Neuropsychologia ; 53 , — Polity Press: Cambridge, UK. Gigerenzer G and Gaissmaier W Heuristic decision making. Annual Review of Psychology ; 62 , — Gilbert GM Stereotype persistence and change among college students. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology ; 46 2 : — CAS Google Scholar. Gillespie A Social representations, alternative representations and semantic barriers. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour ; 38 4 : — Psychological Review ; 1 : 4— Journal of Personality and Social Psychology ; 4 : — Journal of Personality and Social Psychology ; 74 6 : — Meta-analysis of predictive validity.
0コメント